Violence Ethics

The perception of violence in response to the evils of bad government society varies from person to person, not just because these are individuals, but because they have played their specific features to load, imposed on them or a way or another the "win?, so a business in which only extends about his" empire?, a housewife who lives only "happiness? of your home, priests and parishioners who see poverty as divine, never approve of any violence by the oppressed. On the contrary, it is these groups that generate it, are the poor, the marginalized, the excluded, those that cause a government to which they owe their peace and quiet world. It's easy to swallow this, we see messages everywhere that "violence begets violence?, Only seen the reverse: the violence that started the oppressed and the violence with which the government is forced to respond. However, opening his eyes and putting our minds in the land of this country (because they have feet, we all suffer the ravages of a bad government but many want to seem immune) we realize how necessary and logical response is violence to humiliation, oppression, hunger, fear, insecurity, despair, all that to which a Mexican is subjected by the simple fact of being here.

Of course the violence that calls for social justice is ethical and necessary. Live in a country already eaten by this, and I mean executed, beheaded and others, I mean those who are victims of violence since they first break in this country, lack of medicines, home, food, etc. . that are denied. Of course, then they say: "violence begets violence?.